Interview notes are one meeting. You have five.
Metaview is built around the interview and lives in its own workspace, then syncs into whatever holds your records. Recruitly holds your records. So the AI sits in the client briefing, the BD call, the screen, the debrief and the reference — and the notes are already on the job.
A tool beside your system
Their published plans run from a free tier capped at 25 conversations to per-seat paid tiers, with the recruiting platform priced on request. Checked 22 August 2026.
The notes are already where the work is
Because the meeting assistant and the ATS are the same product.
An agency desk is not an interview panel
In-house teams run interviews. Agencies run intake calls, business development, screens, client debriefs and references — and the intake call is where the money is actually decided.
The client briefing
Notes, synced to your ATS
Metaview
A drafted job, matched the same day
Recruitly
The BD call
Notes, if you invite it
Metaview
Next steps on the deal, plus the follow-up
Recruitly
The screen
Its strongest ground
Metaview
Notes, scorecard prefill and the pipeline moved
Recruitly
Based on Metaview’s published product and pricing pages, checked 22 August 2026. Their pricing changes — check their site, and hold ours to the same standard.
What an assistant can do when it owns the database
Written onto the record
Notes land on the client, the candidate and the job in the CRM your agency already runs on. Nothing to copy, nothing to file, nothing to reconcile.
The call becomes the job
A client briefing drafts the vacancy: requirements, band, process and fee, ready to publish and match against the same afternoon.
Commitments become tasks
Every promise made in the room becomes a task with an owner and a date, or a callback in the queue. Not a bullet in a document.
The rest of the desk
Jobs, candidates, shortlists, placements, billings, campaigns, WhatsApp and an AI phone system — in the same subscription.
Next to the record, or on it
Every notetaker in this category ends at the same wall: it has excellent notes and nowhere of its own to put them.
Metaview solves that with an integration into your ATS, which is the right answer if the ATS belongs to someone else. It writes a summary into a field. It cannot draft the vacancy, move a pipeline stage, queue the callback you promised or brief you before the next call, because none of those objects are its to touch.
Recruitly does those things for the same reason it can charge by the hour rather than by the seat: the meeting, the job, the candidate and the pipeline are one product, built for recruitment agencies and nobody else.
Recruitly vs Metaview
Both take good notes. Only one of them is where your desk already lives.
| What you licence | Hours attended | Seats, per recruiter |
| Meeting types it is built for | Briefing, BD, screen, debrief, reference | Interview-led |
| Where the notes live | On the client, candidate and job | Its workspace, then synced |
| Drafts the vacancy from an intake call | Included | — |
| Action items become owned CRM tasks | Included | Exported or synced |
| Needs a calendar or ATS connection | No — the invite is enough | Yes |
| Applicant tracking system | Included | — |
| Recruitment CRM | Included | — |
| AI phone system in the same product | Included | — |
| Job distribution to 50+ boards | Included | — |
| Cost of a quiet month | Nothing | The full seat |
Capability comparison against Metaview’s published plans, checked 22 August 2026.
Questions before you move
Is Metaview not the recruiting one?
It is, and it is good at what it does. The distinction is narrower than the marketing suggests: Metaview is built around the interview, for teams whose system of record is somewhere else. An agency’s most valuable meeting is not the interview, it is the client intake call that creates the job — and that is a conversation only something holding your vacancies can turn into anything.
We already have an ATS. Why would we move?
You would not move for a notetaker, and we would not ask you to. You would move because the same subscription is your ATS, your CRM, your phone system and your meeting assistant, and every one of them is better for the others existing. If your ATS is working for you, the honest answer is that Metaview plus that ATS is a reasonable setup — just an expensive one, per seat, forever.
What does it cost us to try?
Nothing to start, and $1.50 an hour of meeting after your first free hour. There is no seat to buy for the consultant who runs two client calls a month, and no annual commitment to sign before you have seen it work.
Does yours do interviews properly?
Yes — screening notes, a scorecard prefilled with the candidate’s own words as evidence, and stage moves after a debrief. The difference is that it does the other four meeting types as well, and it does them onto the records those meetings were about.